Luke 4:14-21
The beauty, and also
the danger of the gospels is that each book is written from a contrasting viewpoint.
If you are looking for one consistent story from Matthew, Mark, Luke and John
you will be sorely disappointed. Each writer brings not only his own particular
perspective, he is writing to a people who have been shaped by different cultural
experiences. Each writer takes on the task of converting this distinctive
community through a unique telling of the story which he hopes will capture
their hearts and minds. These differing perspectives are exposed in the opening
chapters of each of the gospels.
In Mark, the shortest
and oldest gospel, the writer shrouds the telling of the story in mystery. The
goal is for the reader to discover who this man Jesus is. Clues are given along
the way and we are encouraged to race through the gospel believing eventually the
truth will be revealed.
The writer of John has
no such desire to hold secrets from our hearts. From the very first verse we
are told Jesus is the Word and the Word is God. Each chapter builds on our
knowledge of God and Jesus being one.
Matthew wants to
accomplish more than just the telling of the story. Matthew wants his gospel to
instruct a Jewish audience on how to build a worshipping community. It is a
story which begins with wise men seeking a child and ends with the children of
God seeking a long promised truth.
And then there is
Luke. This gospel was initially presented to a group of illiterate slaves and
women who had little designs of ever being considered human beings. They
desired a savior who was born among them and a God who would respond to their
cries with a word of hope.
I have observed in my
years as both minister and educator that adults gravitate toward the Gospel of
John while writers of children’s materials depend heavily on Luke. The reason
is obvious. The majority of the parables of Jesus are found in Luke. Luke
introduces Jesus through the stories Jesus told. In John we learn about Jesus
through a series of discourses identifying our savior as the good shepherd, the
bread of life and the light of the world. John was a theologian who dealt in
absolutes. Luke was a storyteller who allowed a little more room for saint and
sinner.
Luke begins the ministry
of Jesus with a story. The reputation of Jesus as a teacher had spread
throughout the countryside. People were amazed by his words. Then one week-end
Jesus decided to pay a visit to his hometown. His reputation preceded him. On
his arrival at the synagogue Jesus was
asked if he would offer a lesson from the prophets. Jesus selected Isaiah 61
and began to read.
The
Spirit of the Lord is upon me.
God has anointed me to bring Good News
to the poor;
God has sent me to proclaim release to
the captives,
Recovery of sight to the blind,
And offer freedom to the oppressed.
I am to proclaim that this is the year
of God’s jubilation.
Luke
is the only gospel writer to record this event and the reason is obvious. From
the beginning of Luke’s gospel, the original audiences were told Jesus came to
liberate the poor, the broken, the oppressed and the downtrodden. This was their hope and prayer. In the midst
of their afflictions, they were assured that God did care for them.
In
contrast, the ministry of Jesus in John’s gospel begins with Nicodemus, a man
of distinction and a leader in the religious community. Jesus and Nicodemus
engage in a powerful discourse in which Jesus introduces the concept of being
born again and ends with, “For God so loved the world, God gave his only son
for the salvation of humankind.” This is powerful and inspiring stuff. It
speaks to inquirers looking for words of truth beyond their own individual
journey. But what if more than just your soul is hungry? What if more than just
your heart is imprisoned?
In
1986 I traveled to Nicaragua, a country in the midst of a civil war. I was intrigued
that many of the leaders of the Sandinistas were Roman Catholic priest. During my stay I met the poet Ernesto Cardenal
and asked how he justified his calling as both a priest and a revolutionary.
Very quietly he confesed, “As a priest, I taught my people about the love of
God. We sang the songs and broke the bread together. At the cathedral, the rich
and powerful broke the same bread and sang the same songs. But they never did
anything to exhibit the love of God. When I would read, “God so loved the world
he gave his son”, my people would nod and go back to their painful lives. But
when I read, ‘Jesus came to bring good news to the poor, to release the
captives, and free the oppressed’, my people were given hope.”
What
I brought back from my Nicaraguan experience was a dramatic understanding that
not all folks interpret the Bible the same way. When Jesus read Isaiah 61 some listeners
heard it as an unfulfilled promise of the past, some had their hopes raised and
the majority wondered how that particular text impacted them at that moment. When
Jesus sat down, all eyes were fixed on him wondering why he would choose such a
passage. Jesus responded by adding a footnote, “Today the scripture has been
fulfilled in your reading.” That is when a riot broke out. This text about the
poor and the captives was fine as long as it stayed in the past tense. Everyone
in that synagogue knew about The Day of the
Lord. They all prayed for the time when a Messiah would come. But they
weren’t necessarily anxious for it to happen. The folks in the synagogue were
the leaders in the community. They were the shopkeepers and merchants. Even the
father of Jesus had an established business. The Messiah would radically change
their lives and change was not necessarily part of their agenda.
Are
they much different from us? Our Brief Statement of Faith ends with the
pronouncement, “Come Lord Jesus”. Is that really what you want? Some of you are
lucky enough to have lived in this beautiful valley from birth. Most of us
worked our entire lives just to get here. Do we really want Jesus showing up on
our doorsteps and turning our whole existence upside down? Could it be what we are really praying is,
“When I die, come Lord Jesus, and make heaven an extension of what I am now
experiencing.”
Established
folks in the town of Nazareth were not excited about the Messiah showing up
because they were, for the most part, content with their lives. The same could
not be said of the early readers of Luke’s gospel. They desired to be liberated
from their economic status and captivated by a faith that offered hope. If we
learn nothing else from the gospels we need to understand Jesus comes to us
where we are. That is not only OK, it is enlightening.
A recent article in
Christian Century spoke about the churches, or rather the lack of churches in
Vancouver. At first glance one might think Nellysford and Vancouver have little
in common. Thirty years ago Vancouver was a sleepy seaport with cheap real
estate. But with its spectacular scenery
it remade itself into place where people desired to live. Soon retirees who
loved to recreate flocked to Vancouver. The population grew but not the size of
the local churches. Hiking and skiing became a lot more important than church
on Sunday morning.
Most
of the churches in Vancouver tried to hold on to their traditional ways of
being a church. They vocally attacked the new culture that embraced their city.
Most of these churches have now closed. But a few congregations saw this as an
opportunity to explore seeing the gospel through different eyes. Instead of
condemning the emerging culture, they listened to both the spiritual and
corporeal needs of their new community. By not doing church the way they had
always done it, these churches have become relevant to a new and changing
culture.
The
Spirit of God has always brought the gospel in a way that is meaningful to our
particular lives. Nothing new with that thought. But consider this. What if,
from the beginning, God understood that we live in a large diverse world? What
if, just as the gospel writers brought a different Jesus to each of their
communities, we might consider that the Jesus we claim might look a bit
different to someone who has not been raised in a traditional congregation? If
we can move past the idea that only one understanding of God works for every
situation, think of the opportunity that lies before us. The Spirit of the Lord
has anointed us to bring the good news to a world that is not the same audience
once confronted by Billy Graham. To some, like the readers of Mark, the name
Jesus is a mystery. To others, like the readers of Matthew, they are folks who
left the church and aren’t going back. To many, like the readers of John, they
have been in the church all their lives but need to be challenged by the spirit
of God in a new way. Then there are those folks like those who first heard the
Gospel of Luke, the outcast of society who hunger for a word of hope. There is
not, nor has there ever been, one formula for telling the story. And the good
news is the Spirit of the Lord has always been leading the church toward new
and creative ways to engage others in what for us has been the life changing truth that God loves us and God cares for us.
Each
gospel begins differently. Each gospel writer tells the story of Jesus in his
own way. But each gospel ends with the same command, “Go and proclaim that the
Spirit of God is among you.”
This is our unique
challenge. We are called not only to speak of our faith but hear perspectives
that might seem foreign to both our tongue and heart. No single word can fully
embrace the immenseness of God’s grace. No single thought can fully explain the
vastness of God’s love. The Spirit of God combines both heaven and earth. The
Spirit of God finds intersection within body and mind. The Spirit of God seeks
justice, loves mercy and humbly engages in every facet of the human experience.
I suspect if we claim to love God with all our heart, mind and souls we are
going to have to stretch our hearts, open our minds, and strengthen our souls
because God’s imagination is too grand to be limited by a singular human
thought. The writers of the gospels knew this. Together they accomplished what
one writer alone could never achieve. God is now calling on us to embrace this
concept because there is a huge world out there desperate to hear God’s story
of grace and reconciliation. Some of them listen to Jay Z. Others still prefer
Sinatra. And that is wonderful, unless I think the story can only be told “My
Way”.
Spirit of God, capture
us with your wild imagination. Then liberate us sing to Your diverse gospel of
grace. Amen.